Explore Reddit –
/r/openscience
106 subscribers ∙ created 12 years ago ∙ last fetched 5 years ago
Top Related Subreddits
/r/Math (1,528,864)
/r/Environment (722,824)
/r/Geology (112,500)
/r/Neuroscience (94,769)
/r/PhilosophyofScience (82,223)
/r/science (6,907)
/r/Entomology (573)
/r/EnvironmentalScience (377)
/r/HardScience (324)
/r/askscience (156)
/r/Scholar (60)
/r/Chemistry (41)
/r/Biology (26)
/r/Psychology (20)
/r/Anthropology (19)
/r/Physics (17)
/r/SciencePolicy (6)
/r/SocSci (6)
/r/proceedings (5)
/r/everythingscience (4)
/r/Statistics (3)
/r/SoftScience (2)
/r/Geography (1)
/r/academia (0)
Top All-Time Posts
Someone callin' Nature out!
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎13 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 7 years ago
Making science more open at GitHub
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎7 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 6 years ago
What is open access? - This is the first in a series of posts in which we go into more detail about some of the concepts that F1000Research is based on
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎6 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 6 years ago
Got Science? July 2013: Pushing Back Against Corporate "Counterfeit Science"
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎7 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 7 years ago
The "Reproducibility Project," part of the "Open Science Framework" is offering small replication grants for psychology studies
1 comments ∙ ⬆︎6 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 7 years ago
Guide to Open Science
2 comments ∙ ⬆︎5 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 7 years ago
Public Library of Science (PLOS) publishes template to allows authors to submit their manuscript formatted in LaTeX to any of their journals
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎6 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 7 years ago
The Open Science Framework is an endeavor open to any researcher -- even undergrad -- for investigating to what extent published research is replicable (in the Reproducibility Project) and in developing infrastructure for scientific collaboration in general.
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎4 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 8 years ago
The value of open data in academic science
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎5 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 6 years ago
Citation management tool for open science
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎3 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 6 years ago
linked open data for science
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎5 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 6 years ago
Should research subjects have access to their raw data?
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎2 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 7 years ago
"Hypothes.is, building better discussion on the Internet": does Open Annotation apply well to science?
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎4 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 7 years ago
Zooniverse tech lead to work on "all things science" for GitHub
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎5 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 7 years ago
Academic whistle blowing declared a violation of good scientific practice in Germany
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎4 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 7 years ago
Open Science Badges
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎3 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 5 years ago
"Researchers Sharing Data Was Supposed to Change Science Forever. Did It?"--the (dis)incentives remain all wrong
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎3 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 5 years ago
open science year in review
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎3 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 6 years ago
Five collaborative writing tools for academics
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎3 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 6 years ago
7 rules of thumb for your open science project
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎3 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 6 years ago
Open_FDA launches today!
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎3 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 6 years ago
Science AMA Series: I’m Mark Hahnel, former stem cell biologist, founder of figshare.
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎3 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 6 years ago
Knowledge Pirates, a fiction on Open Access
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎3 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 7 years ago
'To Be Submitted', A Good Scientific Idea | DiscoverMagazine.com
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎3 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 7 years ago
Video: The importance of rapid publication | Discussions - F1000 Research
0 comments ∙ ⬆︎3 ∙ ⬇︎0 ∙ posted 7 years ago